The Employment and Labour Relations Court routinely awards up to twelve months' gross salary in compensation where a termination is found unfair. The recurring fault line is procedure: employers establish a valid reason but skip the statutory hearing.
Substantive fairness
Sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007 require the employer to prove a valid reason for termination — typically misconduct, poor performance, redundancy or operational requirements. Bare assertions in a termination letter are insufficient.
Procedural fairness: Section 41
Before terminating on grounds of misconduct or poor performance, the employer must explain the reason in a language the employee understands, in the presence of a fellow employee or shop-floor union representative chosen by the employee, and give the employee an opportunity to respond.
A documented show-cause letter, a properly minuted hearing and a reasoned decision letter are the minimum evidentiary record.
Redundancy
Section 40 imposes additional duties: at least one month's notice to the employee and the labour officer, selection on fair criteria (commonly seniority, skill and reliability), payment of accrued leave in cash, one month's notice pay and severance at not less than fifteen days' pay for each completed year of service.
Remedies and exposure
Where termination is found unfair, the court may order reinstatement, re-engagement or compensation up to twelve months' gross salary, in addition to terminal dues. Punitive cost orders are not unusual where the conduct is egregious.
Citations & further reading
Related practice areas
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should obtain specific counsel on their particular matters.
